Floship vs GPA Logistics

GPA Logistics discloses 2,000,000 square feet of total warehouse capacity across their 9 facilities, providing transparency about their storage capabilities. Floship operates 9 warehouses but does not specify total capacity. For brands with significant inventory volumes, large SKU counts, or substantial seasonal storage needs, GPA's disclosed capacity provides more certainty about their ability to accommodate growth. However, Floship's global distribution may mean capacity is strategically allocated across international markets rather than concentrated domestically.

Floship explicitly lists CBD and FDA Approved products among their service specialties, indicating established compliance processes and specialized handling capabilities for regulated items. GPA Logistics does not disclose specific expertise with regulated products. If you sell CBD, supplements, cosmetics, or other FDA-regulated items, Floship's documented experience makes them the safer choice to ensure proper handling, storage conditions, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Floship specifically lists Apparel as a service specialty and has proven experience with fashion brands like Nordgreen, a premium Danish watch company. This demonstrates capability with fashion products requiring careful handling, quality control, and brand-appropriate packaging. GPA Logistics does not disclose apparel specialization. For clothing, accessories, and fashion brands—particularly those selling internationally—Floship's documented apparel expertise and work with style-conscious brands makes them the more qualified choice.

Neither company provides detailed technology integration lists in their available information. Floship markets 'smart-tech' capabilities as part of their service offering, while GPA Logistics emphasizes their warehouse management system and data-driven tools. During your evaluation process, you should specifically request information about integrations with your ecommerce platform (Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, etc.), shipping carriers, and any specialized software your business uses. Ask both companies for their complete integration marketplace and API documentation.

Both Floship and GPA Logistics currently show 0 customer reviews in available data, providing no public performance metrics on order accuracy, fulfillment speed, or customer service quality. This lack of social proof means you should request client references directly from both companies, specifically asking for contacts in your product category and similar order volume ranges. Consider asking for case studies, service level agreement (SLA) performance data, and permission to speak with 2-3 current clients before committing.

Neither company discloses monthly minimums or pricing structures in their publicly available information. Pricing will likely depend on your order volume, storage requirements, product type, and geographic distribution needs. When requesting quotes, ensure you provide identical specifications to both companies including: monthly order volume, average items per order, SKU count, special handling requirements, and desired warehouse locations. Floship's international network may carry premium pricing, while GPA's domestic focus might offer competitive rates for US-only fulfillment.

With neither company disclosing monthly minimums, both theoretically serve businesses of all sizes. GPA Logistics explicitly states their commitment to 'businesses of all sizes' and emphasizes tailored solutions, potentially making them more accommodating for smaller operations. However, Floship's global infrastructure and specialized capabilities may be oversized for startups shipping under 500 orders monthly with purely domestic customers. Request minimum order requirements, setup fees, and contract terms from both companies. Smaller businesses focused on US sales should lean toward GPA, while small international brands may find value in Floship's global reach despite potentially higher minimums.